High school hazing Essay

Hazing by way of translation refers to use of harassment, humiliation or step as away of initiating an individual into a particular gang or conference. Hazing can involve either physical process which usually be violent in nature or can involve amiable processes which usually are degrading in nature. The person undergoing hazing is expected to hold water the ritualistic tests that he is subjected to and this is seen as a way of promoting group faithfulness and bond get along with as it involves shared suffering with other members of the group or participants. Hazing whitethorn occur in a number of contexts including the armed forces, workplace, senior high school schools, sororities and fraternities (Davis, 1998). Rookies let hazing to take place repayable to a number of reasons.They may want to be associated and belong to the in-group and hence letting themselves to be subjected to hazing. This is due to the fact that the in-group has its own beliefs, identity, norms and va lues. Cognitive dissonance as explained by Leon Festinger may lead to hazing. (Monarch, 1998) Despite the fact that hazing has been prevalent mover the years, it has been difficult for researchers to deliberate it in terms of its causative underlying mechanisms because of its secretive nature. This has contributed to poor ground of hazing. Although the many cases of hazing are never reported, various incidents curb occurred where by victims have suffered severe injuries and even death. An example is an incident that occurred in Clarkson University on tenth February 1997 where a 1st year student along with his colleagues was forced to soak up a large quantity of alcohol from a bucket. The poor 17 year old student was found the following day all of a sudden after allegedly choking on his own vomit (Sweet, 1999). This is unspoiled one of the many hazing stories of which the majority is not as severe. The aim of this larn was therefore to investigate hazing in United States of A merica High Schools. The reputation was carried out by Alfred University, USA in April 2000.MethodologyOut of about 15 million high school students in United States, a existence sample of 20, 000 was selected which included both seniors and juniors. A appraise cock was prepared and mailed to the selected 20,000 students using their home addresses. On follow up it was dis veiled that only 5.46% did not reach their destination hence it was assumed that approximately 18,600 of the panorama instruments were delivered. However the responses that were received totaled 1,541 which reflected an 8.28 % rate of response. The cover letter of the survey instrument consisted of enough information about the survey to solicit informed consent from the respondent and also deadline of the return of the instrument. The survey instrument consisted of the background of the respondents including their school grade, sex, resident state, type of school, and any rank and file in a group, race and l ocation. The instrument also consisted of the respondents experience with hazing and its definition whereby they were asked to state whether for each type of a group they joined because of hazing, didnt join because they were afraid to haze, or were forced to leave the group because of hazing. Students were asked during what age they were introduced to hazing, if ever, if they reported it, and what they felt were the most appropriate ways of preventing it. The survey at long last asked the students what activities they were expected to do in order to join a group or a team in high school. Initiation sort that was used was grouped into 4 categories and was from the previous years show of athletes of NCAA. The grouping included community building, endangering, abuse of nerve and humiliation. Open cease questions regarding the students suggestions about suggestions of other preventive strategies, motive for participation, experiences and consequences, later feelings and activitie s that were required of them were asked. (High School hazing, 2008) Statistical analysis Statistical tables were used to crumple each respondent group of students. Across-tab involving gender and area of residence was occupied to come up with sample weights.The six groups of females and males by region were one by one weighted by frequency of sample and divided by the population to come up with estimations of prevalence and lead to production of percentages expected for solid population based to the current limited knowledge. Cross-tabular analysis employing chi-square statistics were conducted to study of import differences among groups. Activities were used to cross demographic groups in order to identify heated up spots and at risk groups.ResultsThe study found out that the students were of the plenty that hazing is condoned by adults. They felt that hazing was acceptable socially and they would significantly engage in the activity especially if they knew of a hazed adult. The students usually do not estimate hazing is a big problem. Half of the students that were involved in abuse of substance and other illegal acts as a way of being veritable into a group believed their activities as hazing. However, 98% of the students believed that dangerous hazing was not corking while 86% believed that hazing that is humiliating was not good. The study also found out that student saw hazing as a way of having diversion and as exciting. It was also found out that hazing begins at a schoolboyish age and can progress throughout life. (Eisenber, 1986)